Trends · 3 October 2026

Does the Brand Need a Partnership at All?

Partnerships have become a familiar route to relevance. But before choosing the talent, event or organisation, there is a more fundamental question worth asking: should the partnership exist in the first place?

Image: Nike × Jacquemus

Partnerships are everywhere.

Fashion enters sport. Automotive enters entertainment. Luxury enters music. Technology enters art. Brands collaborate with other brands, attach themselves to cultural moments and announce new ambassadors almost every week.

A celebrity couple walking through a Formula 1 paddock surrounded by cameras

There is an understandable reason for it. A good partnership can give a company access to audiences, credibility, ideas and environments it might struggle to reach alone.

But as partnerships become increasingly normal, there is a risk that the decision to have one comes before the reason for having it.

Want younger consumers? Enter music.

Want cultural relevance? Find an ambassador.

Want to reposition the brand? Collaborate with someone unexpected.

Sometimes those answers may be right.

Sometimes there is nothing for the partnership to solve.

01

A partnership should have a job

Cultural relevance is often discussed as though every brand should want as much of it as possible.

But relevance only matters when it contributes to something the brand is actually trying to achieve.

Not every company needs to be part of fashion, music, film or sport. Entering those spaces simply because they are culturally prominent can create visibility without creating much value.

Why should this brand be here?

If the answer is primarily that the audience is attractive, the event is prestigious or competitors are already participating, something may be missing.

Without a stronger reason, a brand may simply be renting space inside somebody else's relevance.

02

What changes if we do this?

Partnerships become particularly valuable when the change a brand wants to make depends on something it doesn't fully possess itself.

That might be credibility in a particular world, access to a community, specialist expertise, a different creative perspective or permission to participate somewhere the brand couldn't enter convincingly alone.

In those situations, the partner isn't decoration around the strategy.

They are part of what makes the strategy possible.

A company might combine expertise with another brand to create something neither could make independently. An institution might provide a context in which people experience the brand differently. A person might contribute a perspective, community or skill that changes what the brand can do.

Reach, press coverage and commercial return still matter.

But those are outputs.

The more fundamental question is what becomes possible because the relationship exists.

03

Sometimes the problem is somewhere else

Sometimes the most strategic partnership decision is deciding not to pursue one.

If consumers don't understand the product, a celebrity may not fix that.

If the customer experience is poor, a cultural collaboration may only attract more people to experience the problem.

If the brand itself is unclear about what it wants to represent, attaching another name to it may add attention without adding clarity.

And if a company already has strong credibility with the audience it wants to reach, another partnership may simply be unnecessary.

There are problems partnerships are particularly good at solving.

There are others they aren't.

04

Not every opportunity needs to become a partnership

There is pressure on brands to constantly participate. A competitor announces a high-profile collaboration and suddenly doing nothing can feel like falling behind.

But restraint can be strategic too.

The fact that a brand can access a person, event or cultural space doesn't mean it should.

Sometimes the right answer will be a person. Sometimes an institution, event, company or community.

And sometimes the right answer will be none of them.

So before deciding who the partner should be, there is a more useful question:

What would become possible with a partner that isn't possible without one?

If there isn't a convincing answer, perhaps there shouldn't be a partnership.

ni-comms Insights

Perspectives on strategic partnerships, culture and long-term brand relevance.

Explore more Insights